Andrew
Well-known member
I don't know what that is and if I remember correctly this person put google.com as the domain being used for the skins and icons.I'm surprised you didn't file a DMCA Notice to the owner of the site.
I don't know what that is and if I remember correctly this person put google.com as the domain being used for the skins and icons.I'm surprised you didn't file a DMCA Notice to the owner of the site.
DMCAI don't know what that is and if I remember correctly this person put google.com as the domain being used for the skins and icons.
Andrew is describing a fraudulent customer that bought every product that was available on the site, not that he sold the actual site.I'm surprised you didn't file a DMCA Notice to the owner of the site.
I know...and he could still file a DMCA based on each individual product.Andrew is describing a fraudulent customer that bought every product that was available on the site, not that he sold the actual site.
Against who? A non-existent or fake site listed in the customer's account? The site that is redistributing the files? Maybe a site that is using the pirated style? Heck, people have been sending DMCA notices to one particular vB pirate site & their host for years and have had literally no impact. I've been down this path many times and is one of the reasons why I got out of the vB styles business some years ago. Nothing like releasing a brand new product only to see it on pirate sites the same day it was released. Heck, I've had closed beta copies of some stuff pirated before the public even saw it.I know...and he could still file a DMCA based on each individual product.
But not doing anything sends the message that it is okay to do it.When it comes to non-tangible software goods, especially styles, the only outcome of sending a DMCA is that the sender feels good for a few minutes.
The only people who will ever know that a DMCA was even sent was (A) the sender and (B) the recipient who most likely will chuckle at the expense of A and then continue on. Heck, there are several style vendors here, some former & some current, just ask them how well DMCAs work.But not doing anything sends the message that it is okay to do it.
I know how they work, I've used them before and no, I don't feel I wasted my time altho it was time consuming and accomplished very little. I did manage to be a nudge. And the other designers affected were also nudges. Get enough doing it, and it may eventually stop that one.The only people who will ever know that a DMCA was even sent was (A) the sender and (B) the recipient who most likely will chuckle at the expense of A and then continue on. Heck, there are several style vendors here, some former & some current, just ask them how well DMCAs work.
Depending on where the offending site is hosted, a properly constructed DMCA notification can actually be very effective - if the site owner fails to act, contact the host and it will progress from there.The only people who will ever know that a DMCA was even sent was (A) the sender and (B) the recipient who most likely will chuckle at the expense of A and then continue on. Heck, there are several style vendors here, some former & some current, just ask them how well DMCAs work.
It good to see that there are still some Don Quixotes in the world fighting the battle. I mean that as a compliment in that you believe there are some battles that can be won yet. I was like that once.I know how they work, I've used them before and no, I don't feel I wasted my time altho it was time consuming and accomplished very little. I did manage to be a nudge. And the other designers affected were also nudges. Get enough doing it, and it may eventually stop that one.
Have you ever tried dealing with a certain "team" site? I can send you the URL via if you're curious. Many have tried, all to no avail.Depending on where the offending site is hosted, a properly constructed DMCA notification can actually be very effective - if the site owner fails to act, contact the host and it will progress from there.
Technically, the design itself is copyrighted.I just showed how it's simple to create own nice-looking styles using the styles from vBulletin. If FT want to create their own style Lustrous they of course can do it, but it will be paid. My style is free and uses NO COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. Their style of course will include some icons and a psd. I also want to say that the logo was created from the blank and uses different effects form the original one so it has no copyright of FT.
We aren't discussing your style specifically. In fact I think a number of us have said that we don't have a problem with your style. I think we're just discussing the topic in general at this point.Guys, I don't understand, what are you complaining about? The style is FREE. So you don't have to pay for it, otherwise if you don't like that it was copied from Lustrous you may not to download it, it's only up to you. I will understand your complains if the style was paid but it's not.
But can you tell me why do you think so?Technically, the design itself is copyrighted.
Because the design itself is the work of the original creator and is copyrighted.But can you tell me why do you think so?![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.