The two "sentences" run concurrently, not consecutively.
However, if we are to try and offer our members some means to enquire upon or be advised of any temporary removal of permission (i.e. by being added to a secondary usergroup with reduced permission) for a fixed and defined term, then it would make sense that such actions are de-duplicated. In other words using Stuart's example
- 10pts = one week added to usergroup Suspended
- 20pts = one month (ditto)
then if we award someone 20pts, what happens is the system allocates two temp. actions - a one week one AND a one month one.
Ideally, the one month action should be the ONLY action present and visible on the account; the one-week action should be overwritten or merged or deduplicated or force-expired when it's superseded. And that should happen whether the two thresholds were passed concurrently or at different times.
