Thanks!
Ok, will look at this a little closer tomorrow to see if I can trigger anything similar.
However, my immediate thought is that those images are not well optimised. I'm sure there's a range of sizes here, some might be considerably smaller but if the average is ~45KB and people have around 20 of them loading then that's nearly 1MB.
But with a simple online compression tool it looks like they can be optimised considerably. And potentially with better tools even smaller:
[ATTACH=full]254071[/ATTACH]
If you get them down to an average of 15KB then that's a considerable saving alone and probably worth doing, especially if you're talking dozens of add-ons.
But, still, we'll look into this and see if we can make any improvements there and I'll report back.
