Recent content by nestor718

Wooo! Thank you EQ! All is working 100% now!! Thank you, thank you!

Thanks! I'll test it out a little later since I'm at work now and parts of PodOmatic are blocked :D I'll have to give it a go from home.

Ok! Thanks much for your help EQ!!! And yeah, all your code was working as intended. But PodOmatic was returning varying results as we have determined.

Okay! I figured it out. It seems some pages on PodOmatic render the <iframe> object and others the embeded <object> that the 'preg_match' is looking for. Here's a REAL hacky solution and I'm sure you guys can clean it up. I made it look for the actual <iframe> source and that has all the values...

I think the problem is here: if(preg_match('#<param name=\'movie\' value=\'http://(?P<bbmovie>[a-z0-9-_.]+\.com/swf/joeplayer_v18c\.swf)\'></param>\s<param\sname=\'flashvars\'\svalue=\'(?P<bbflashvars>[a-z0-9-=&%._]+)%3Fauto#si', $pageHtml, $match)) I made it return the $mediakey and the...

Okay! Not working for the following URL I guess since it contains numbers in the first ID? http://bgchck1960.podomatic.com/entry/2011-12-16T16_59_50-08_00 Please advise!

Awesome! Works like a charm!!!! Thanks again EQnoble!

Many thanks EQnoble! Trying it out right now!!! (y)

Donation sent! Thanks so much!!!!

Desperately seeking an option for this too as I have a DJ site that uses Pod-O-Matic heavily. What is the actual source file the parses the {$id} ? Maybe I can hack to accept {$idx} ?? Should we request this as a feature or has it already been requested?

I guess this would be a feature suggestion then? My IPboard has a setting to use my facebook avatar even if the account was associated later on. I'll request this in the proper forum if it hasn't been suggested yet.

vB3.8 is like WindowsXP

Yeah, try it out. Isn't that bad. And like i said, with app pool isolation you get the same results. So what you would do is create a different app pool for your heavily used site and give it rules to recycle under certain conditions. But the mere fact you're creating a separate app pool gives...

Might be because PHP is a competing technology to ASP.NET? LOL! It was pretty crafty of M$ to 'recommend' the lower performing php-cgi.exe over the ISAPI module to the point the official releases no longer fully support it. When high yield sites go hunting for high stress interpreters the choice...

Blandt, that's 'ISAPI' lol! and ISAPI run much better than the fastCGI but what the 'experts' are worried about is thread safety. ISAPI runs as an extension of IIS in a single thread (which is why it performs better) and fastCGI run in multi thread thereby isolated and more 'safe' to the machine...